TR ID

Monday, March 25, 2013

Tamar Braxton: 'I'm pregnant!'


The youngest of the Braxton clan, Tamar, revealed on "Good Morning America" Wednesday that she is pregnant with her husband of five years, music executive and Lady Gaga's manager, Vincent Herbert.
Tamar, who will celebrate her 36th birthday Sunday, was visiting the show with her sisters and mother promoting the new season of their hit reality show "Braxton Family Values." Minutes into the segment, she rose from her seat and flaunted her very prominent baby bump.
 
"I have a love on top," Braxton said, giving a nod to Beyoncé's 2011 baby bump reveal.
 
After the taping, the "Love and War" singer posted a picture on Instagram of herself and her husband with his hands over her stomach, with the caption "#BeEpic."
 
The mommy to be has a lot to celebrate. The new season of "Braxton Family Values" starts on Thursday on WeTV, she and Herbert have already started filming the second season of their spin-off show "Tamar & Vince," and she has just inked a recording contract with Epic Records.
 
Collected from :http://www.hlntv.com
[Continue Reading]

One of the secrets to Carnival Cruise’s unsinkable business model: free Coast Guard rescues


It would seem like terrible timing to have to report earnings the day after announcing trip-ending malfunctions on two of your ships, and a month after an onboard fire has left one ship adrift in the Gulf of Mexico, with its passengers mired in their own waste for days on end.
And yet, your stock stays afloat. Sure, it opens down 4.7% on the news about the cancelled ships. But it bounces more than half-way back after you announce your first-quarter earnings. And this even though you lowered your earnings guidance for the rest of 2013.
Such is your good fortune if you are Carnival Cruise Lines. One reason the company recovered so easily from its recent disasters is that cruise vacationers have proven to be a forgetful lot—and expedient. Promotions usually win them back after catastrophes; the company indicated in its earnings call yesterday that booking volumes recovered only three weeks after the stranding of the Triumph in the Gulf of Mexico. (It did however take the industry longer to recover from the tragedy of the Costa Concordia, also owned by Carnival, which capsized just over a year ago off the Italian coast with 32 deaths.)
But another key reason is that Carnival has a terrific business model. For one thing, even though it’s headquartered in Miami, it’s incorporated in Panama.
“It is subject to no US labor wage laws. [Carnival has] also escaped US safety occupational hazard safety laws,” James Walker, a maritime lawyer who represents clients seeking legal action against the cruise line industry, told Quartz. “This gives it tremendous advantage over any other form of transportation or hospitality or entertainment business here, all of which have the labor, wage or tax consequences of being a US business.”
That also makes its shipping business exempt from US federal income taxes (as well as from a variety of taxes in other countries in which it operates).
Now, not paying taxes would be great for any business, but it’s a jackpot when you get as much back from the taxpayer as Carnival, as Senator John D. Rockefeller IV pointed out on Twitter:
The senator got into more detail in a letter to Carnival CEO Micky Arison (pdf), noting that the US Coast Guard and the US Navy report that the costs of responding to the 2010 Carnival Splendor incident were $1,541,904.53 and $1,884,376.75, respectively. The Coast Guard tallied its costs in the Triumph fiasco at $779,914.26. “Given that you reportedly pay little or nothing in federal taxes, do you intend to reimburse the Coast Guard and the Navy for the cost of responding to either the Carnival Splendor marine casualty or the Carnival Triumph marine casualty?” wrote Rockefeller.
Rockefeller attached a list (pdf) from the US Coast Guard tracking Cruise Ship investigations since 2008. Here’s a segment of the list from February 2012, minus the latest incidents, with the Carnival incidents highlighted in yellow. (Princess Cruise Lines and Holland America Lines, or HAL, are also Carnival brands.)
 
That’s quite a track record. “”It’s the consequence of not being regulated under a true safety administration of any kind,” Walker says. Some attribute the unusual spate of incidents to management problems at Carnival.
A representative for the company cautions against over-generalizing. ”Each of these situations was different,” Vance Gulliksen, Senior PR manager at Carnival, told Quartz. “All modes of transportation, including cruise ships, have strong overall safety records but sometimes technical issues such as the one Carnival Dream is experiencing will occur from time to time.”

Collected from :http://qz.com
[Continue Reading]

Samsung's Galaxy S4 Is Great But No iPhone Killer


Please stop asking me if the Samsung Galaxy S4 is better than the iPhone 5, and stop calling every new smart phone a potential iPhone killer. Any new phone could be a killer if you consider a thousand small cuts a prelude to death.
Based on specs, the Samsung Galaxy S4 is the better phone. It now has more power and cutting edge features. Things like face/eye tracking and gesture-based controls are features iPhone 5 users can only dream of –- for now.
The resolution of the 0.31-inch-thin Galaxy S4 is higher than the iPhone 5, and there’s more screen real estate on the Galaxy's 5-inch display than the 4-inch one on the iPhone. The Gorilla Glass 3 tech -– the first device to sport the new technology –- is ostensibly stronger than what iPhone 5 has (although only a drop test can tell us for sure).
Inside, the Samsung Galaxy S4 is a near 2GHz quad-core CPU. The dual-core iPhone 5 has 1GHz of power. Samsung stuffed a 13-megapixel camera into the Samsung Galaxy S4, while the iPhone 5 tops out at 8MP. Not to mention the fact that the Galaxy S4 can shoot with both cameras at once to create mind-boggling effects that you may or may not want.
Samsung is also starting to use NFC is interesting ways: letting people pair the phones by tapping and then turning the ad hoc connection between multiple phones into a surround sound system. That’s quite cool, though it also seems pretty impractical.
Feature for feature, the Galaxy S4 appears to have the iPhone 5 beat. So why can’t I declare victory for the Galaxy S4?
Because it’s not that simple.

Hands On

I did spend some time with a couple of preproduction units and must admit, the phone feels and looks good. At 4.6 ounces, it’s relatively light for a 5-inch phone, and since it’s actually somewhat smaller than the Galaxy S III, it didn’t feel like it was stressing my hand.
The marquee features — Air Gesture, Smart Scroll and the Dual Camera — all worked pretty much as advertised. Smart Scroll, which might be Samsung’s biggest innovation, was a bit touchy for me in the preproduction unit. It’s also, as Samsung told me, misunderstood. It’s not eye-tracking per se; instead, the phone’s front-facing sensors see your face and eyes to guide the tilt-to-scroll tech. That’s right, you tilt the phone back and forth to scroll up and down on a page. You cannot simply use your eyes to scroll. It’s a cool feature that, with some refinement and practice on the user’s part, could become useful.
Air view is a highly intuitive feature that I want Apple to adopt immediately: Where programmed, the Samsung Galaxy S4 screen reacts before you touch it. I tried hovering my finger over the browser tabs and then a thumbnail of my hidden pages showed up –- before I even touched the screen. To a certain extent I think this is an amplification of the capacitive abilities that exist in most smartphone screens. You know what I mean: You hover over your phone’s screen and it takes action before you’re ready? Remember, capacitive screens read the conductivity in your fingers. If the signal is strong enough, you probably don’t have to touch. I’m guessing they turned the capacitance up to 11 (though I may be wrong).
Air Gestures feels like a feature from the future. You wave at the screen and things happen. I was, for example, able to switch between browser tabs by waving at the screen. Not a “hello” or “goodbye” wave, mind you. It was more like stroking the airspace over the phone. To make it work right, though, I had to gesture near the top of the Galaxy S4 screen –- over the sensors. Still, once I got the hang of it, it worked so effectively that I want to rename this feature “Galaxy S4 Jedi Control.”
The camera takes ultra-sharp photos, but while the dual-screen feature worked well, I had trouble imaging when I’d want to take a photo like that. I bet people will use the dual-video features more often (think simultaneous video conferencing with prospective home buyers while showcasing your open house).

So It’s Better, Right

In an interview with CNBC, the host tried to nail me down on which phone is better. He could sense my excitement over the new toy, but I wouldn’t take the bait.
Just because the Samsung Galaxy S4 is currently winning the features arms race does not mean everyone should drop their iPhone 5s (or even other competing Android phones) and order a new Galaxy S4.
If you’re an iOS user, you have to consider switching platforms. Android 4.2.2 (what the Galaxy is running) is a good platform, but if you like iOS, you may find it overly complex, even confusing. Some people prefer the gated community of Apple’s App Store to the somewhat looser Google Play store (which doesn't vet every app). Also, there is the issue of OS updates to consider: Samsung may be ready to roll out an OS update later this year, but perhaps carrier partners Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile won’t be. That doesn't happen with iOS. Everyone gets their update at the same time.
There’s also phone size to consider. I think there are people who love big phones (and actually believe phablets like the Note II count as phones) and those who love them a little smaller. I am in the latter camp. I get more than enough utility out of my iPhone 5 screen. When I need more real estate, I switch to a tablet.
Then there’s the ecosystem. While consumers seem more than happy to swap one Android phone for another, or even to make the switch from an iPhone to an Android phone, Apple’s still winning the tablet war. If you buy the Samsung Galaxy S4, will you also get an Android tablet? If so, which one? I still don’t see a lot of Galaxy note 10.1’s in the wild (actually, I see none). The leading Android tablet is the Kindle Fire. It has the Google Play store like the Galaxy S4, but, also like the Galaxy S4, the interface is custom. In other words, you end up with two custom Android interfaces. Apple’s iOS is consistent across devices.
Nothing I’m saying here is a deal-breaker, but all are considerations when choosing your next smartphone.
So, yes, the Samsung Galaxy S4 is an awesome piece of work. I am certain that every current Galaxy S phone owner will want one (and they should). As for switching or beating the iPhone into submission, that’s a more complex battle and a decision that won’t be settled with a spec sheet.
Collected from :http://mashable.comSamsung-galaxy-s-4-2-of-35
[Continue Reading]

Why you should still consider the Galaxy S3 over the Galaxy S4

In this edition of Ask Maggie, CNET's Marguerite Reardon explains why wireless consumers looking for a good bargain should consider the Samsung Galaxy S3, even though the new Galaxy S4 has been announced.

The new Samsung Galaxy S4 has launched, but savvy wireless customers looking for a bargain may still want to consider last year's Galaxy S3.
In this edition of Ask Maggie, I help a reader decide if the newly upgraded flagship Samsung smartphone is worth the hype. There's no question the device is a marked improvement over its predecessor the Samsung Galaxy S3. But the upgraded specs and added bells and whistles might not mean as much to the average consumer, who will likely be just as happy with last year's model, which costs less money.
I also offer another reader my perspective on whether I think smartphone cases are necessary or not.

Galaxy S3 vs. Galaxy S4

Dear Maggie,
Dear Maggie, I have never owned a smartphone before. And I have been considering getting a Samsung Galaxy S3. But now that the Galaxy S4 is coming out, I am wondering if I should get that device instead. I've been considering getting a Galaxy. Is the S4 enough of an upgrade or should I just stick with the S3? I read an early story you wrote that said the price on the S3 is likely to come down. So I was wondering what you think now that the S4 has been announced.
Thanks,
Sam
Dear Sam,
The Galaxy S4 is a terrific phone. And it's a decent upgrade to the Galaxy 3. But Samsung has not revolutionized the smartphone with this new device. In fact, side by side the Galaxy S4 looks very similar to the Galaxy S3. Samsung has used the same sturdy plastic for the S4 that it used in the S3. The home screen button and other buttons are in the same place on the S4 as they are on the S3.
The new Samsung Galaxy S4 (left) and its predecessor, the GS3
(Credit: CNET/Sarah Tew)
That said, there are some hardware differences between the devices. While the devices look the same, the S4 is actually a tad lighter and thinner than the S3. And the guts of the phone are different as well. As my CNET Reviews colleague Jessica Dolcourt said in her first-take review of the product, Samsung seems to have taken every feature to an extreme on the S4.
"The screen is larger (5 inches vs. 4.8 inches), the resolution greater (1,080p vs. 720p), the battery capacity higher (2,600mAh vs. 2100mAH), the processor faster (1.9GHz quad-core or 1.6GHz octa-core vs.1.5GHz, dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 (U.S. version); proprietary 1.4GHz quad-core Exynos), and the rear-facing camera stuffed with more megapixels (13 megapixels vs. 8 megapixels.) But, once you've gone through the features checklist (which also includes lots of internal and external storage space and RAM), it's the software extras that Samsung continues to lean on to keep its phones one step ahead of the competition."
(For a full comparison between the two phones, check out this story by Lynn La, a CNET Reviews editor.)
Some of these new software features include a TV control app, a built-in translation tool, and an app that tracks your eye movement so that you can control the device. One example of how you'd use this is that you can pause a video simply by looking away from the screen. There are also some gesture capabilities and a hover feature that lets you wave your finger over something on the screen to preview an item.
Jessica points out in her review that these software additions are nifty, but they aren't likely to sway consumers when they're deciding which device to buy. And I would agree with her. In fact, I talked to Current Analysis analyst Avi Greengart at the Samsung event and he thinks that users may show off some of these "gee whiz" features to their friends when they first get the new device, but they'll likely never use them again.
What's more, even though these software updates were shown off on the Galaxy S4, it doesn't mean that they will be limited to the S4. Drew Blackard, director of product planning for Samsung Mobile in the U.S, said that many of these software features will also make their way into other Samsung devices, such as the Galaxy S3 and the Galaxy Note phablets.
"The goal is to bring as many features as possible down to the other flagship devices," he said. "Of course, it will be dependent on hardware requirements. But we will definitely bring some of these functionalities to other Samsung devices through software upgrades."
Which device is right for you?
It's a really tough decision. As I said before, the Galaxy S4 is a terrific device. And it's clearly a step above the S3 when it comes to the overall specifications. But you have to ask yourself if that's what is most important to you. Are you the kind of person who buys the top-of-the-linecar? Do you need the latest and greatest TV, laptop, camera, or other gadget on the market? Or are you more concerned with getting the most bang for your buck and paying a reasonable price?
There are plenty of people who need to have the latest technology, whether that's in a car, sporting equipment, or gadgets. If you're that kind of person, get the Galaxy S4.
But if you are like me, and you're a bit more frugal, then I'd consider the Galaxy S3. Here's why: For the average wireless consumer, the specifications available on the Galaxy S3 are more than adequate. And because it's last year's model, you're going to be able to get a really terrific price on it.
Prices have already started falling. A couple of weeks ago when I advised a reader to wait for the Galaxy S4 announcement, you could get the Galaxy S3 on AmazonWireless for AT&T for $79.99 with a two-year contract. Now that price has already dropped to $49.99 for a new device with a two-year contract on AT&T.
CNET's video hands-on with the S4:
Unlocked Galaxy S3 phones are selling for about $350 on eBay. Factory unlocked Galaxy S3 devices on Amazon are priced at $500. When the device was first introduced last year, an unlocked version was about $700 and carriers offered it for $200 with a two-year contract.
Samsung hasn't announced pricing for the new Samsung Galaxy S4 yet, but I'd expect it to be in the same ballpark as other high-end smartphones, which typically cost $200 with a two-year contract and around $700 without a contract.
But there are couple of things to keep in mind. For one, there is a chance that the Galaxy S3 won't get operating system software upgrades as quickly as the newer Galaxy S4. Still, that might not matter much. Keep in mind the S4 will ship with the newest available Google Androidsoftware available today Android 4.2.2, but in May Google is expected to announce a new version of the software at its Google I/O conference in San Francisco. This means that S4 customers will also have "outdated" software only a month or two into sales of the device.
For the average consumer, these upgrades often aren't significant enough to make a major difference, especially for people who are using a smartphone for the first time. In fact, some of those consumers would probably rather have fewer software upgrades than more since software upgrades sometimes change the look and feel of a device.
And for the more tech-savvy subscribers who are concerned about having the latest Android software update, there is always the option of "rooting" the device and installing the upgrade yourself.
Now, I realize that to some people who look at this they will say that a price difference of $150 is not that much, when you consider that no matter what you pay for your device, you'll still be paying on average $2,160 to $2,400 for your wireless service over the life of a two-year contract.
Those folks have a point. But also I don't think that $100 or $150 difference on a device is insignificant. When you consider that many people upgrade devices every 18 months to 2 years, it adds up. I don't know of any other gadget in my life that I am willing to repurchase and replace every two years for $200.
Still, the real cost difference between last year's model and this year's new phone can be seen when you think about buying an unlocked and unsubsidized phone. As I mentioned previously, the Galaxy S3 was around $700 at full price when it was first introduced. And now you can find a new one for $350 on eBay or about half the price.
The bottom line is that I think you should go for the older Galaxy S3 over the Galaxy S4. You'll save some money, and I don't think you'll ever notice that you are sacrificing performance or functionality.
Good luck!

Collected from :http://news.cnet.com

[Continue Reading]

Keyshia Cole Slams Beyoncé's "Bow Down/I Been On" for Mixed Message, Gets Stung by BeyHive



Count Keyshia Cole among those who aren't digging Beyoncé's new song.
"Can't stand when people all self righteous when it's convenient it makes them look good. Lmao! But can still talk s--t when convenient 2 FOH," the Woman to Woman artist tweetedupon the release of Bey's latest single, "Bow Down/I Been On." On the track, Blue Ivy's mom sings, "I know when you were little girls you dreamt of being in my world. Don't forget it. Respect that. Bow down, bitches."
And, though immediately faced with a swarm of offended denizens of the "BeyHive," Cole kept going.
Video Thumbnail: David Beckham Takes a Spill
Video Thumbnail: Tilda Swinton Sleeps in Public
Video Thumbnail: Kristen Stewart Is Covered in Slime
"I done kept it real from the start! #RespectTHAT," shealso wrote. Then: "First "Women need to Stick together" now bitches better Bow. Smh. But it's all G! Chicks stay shooting the shit. But when I speak my mind its a prob. #Well #StayMad."
Comments from the pro-Beyoncé peanut gallery ranged from"U need a hit record ASAP!! @KeyshiaCole u bored and angry..." to @KeyshiaCole When Beyoncé sings she's Sasha Fierce though, so get ya life" and"@KeyshiaCole what's ironic is that you've been talking all that family 1st/God shit for a minute, but then pull the same shit... lol."
"Bitch you ain't gon need NO more perm kits. The #BeyHive bouta snatch you BALD !!! @KeyshiaCole,"tweeted another concerned fan.
"Never said there was any. IM not in denial... God Bless RT @_BEYHive: @KeyshiaCole fuck yo unity," Cole fired back.
Cole also tweeted: "How am i hating? no Mamm or sir. whatever u may be. No H8 RT @GothamsKnight_: damn @KeyshiaCole hating on everybody."
The "Trust and Believe" singer also drew the ire of Destiny's Child fans when she slammed Michelle Williams for "f--king the groove up" during their Super Bowl performance.
"I don't care what anybody else says," Williams later told Bilboard. "I don't let it get me down. It was a beautiful thing."

Collected from :http://www.eonline.com
[Continue Reading]

'Dancing With the Stars' Season 16: Who's the Star to Beat?


"Dancing With the Stars" hosts Tom Bergeron and Brooke Burke-Charvet announced this season's celebrity and professional pairings live on "Good Morning America" on ABC. (Rick Rowell/ABC)

Twelve stars have been tapped to compete in the new season of "Dancing With the Stars," which begins tonight on ABC. The batch includes athletes, comedians and reality-TV stars, but who is the favorite to win the Mirror Ball trophy?
Try Olympic gold medal winner Aly Raisman, one of the members of the U.S. "Fierce Five" gymnastics team at last summer's London Olympics. Las Vegas oddsmaker Johnny Avello pegs Raisman to be the early front-runner, giving her odds of 5 to 1 to win.
"She's just 115 pounds of energy. And if she follows someone like Shawn Johnson. Who knows, maybe she can win it all." Avello told ABC News radio. "Now, it is early, but I think she'll be a contender."
It's a flattering comparison for Raisman: Johnson, a gymnast herself, is a former "Dancing With the Stars" champion.
On the other hand, Avello believes comedian Andy Dick and the star of Bravo's "Vanderpump Rules," Lisa Vanderpump, are the most likely celebrities to be bounced early from the competition. Fortunately for them, the first results show doesn't take place until Tuesday, March 26.
Annie Barrett, a longtime "Dancing With the Stars" recapper for Entertainment Weekly, said Raisman is the contestant to beat, and that Dick will be on a short leash with viewers.
"I really don't think many 'Dancing With the Stars' fans will want to see Andy Dick week after week. I really don't," she told ABC News Radio. "I think he's pretty offensive. He's been through a lot of recent troubles, and I just wouldn't want it to become a freak show starring Andy Dick."
Vanderpump's "Vanderpump Rules" castmate, Stassi Schroeder, a server at Sur, the restaurant featured on the series, told ABC News Radio that Vanderpump thinks she'll be voted out early.
"I thought, she would do amazing, but she keeps talking herself down," Schroeder said. "She's like convincing me that she's not going to do well. She's like, 'I'm only going to last one week, maybe two, if I'm lucky if my fans come out and vote for me.'"
Still, the Sur server doesn't believe the self-deprecating Brit, and says "she'll last a while."
Schroeder's on-again, off-again boyfriend Jason "Jax" Taylor feels the same way. "I think she'll last longer just because of her popularity, regardless if she's good or bad," he told ABC News Radio.
And while neither has seen Vanderpump shake a tail feather inside Sur, they're curious to see what Vanderpump's husband, Ken, thinks of his wife's dance moves.
A reality-TV show star has yet to score top prize on "Dancing."
"Keeping Up With the Kardashians" star Rob Kardashian was the closest one, placing second on season 13 with professional partner Cheryl Burke.
Barrett said that recent Super Bowl winner Jacoby Jones of the Baltimore Ravens is a wild card in the competition and could use his charm to his advantage. If Jones has the footwork like fellow NFL players Emmitt Smith and Donald Driver, who each took home the Mirror Ball trophy, he could come out a winner.
Figure skater Dorothy Hamill might also be a top contender to beat. The 1976 Olympic gold medalist could follow in the footsteps of fellow Olympic figure skating-champion and "Dancing With the Stars" season six champ Kristi Yamguchi's footsteps to take home the Mirror Ball trophy. Olympic speed skater Apolo Anton Ohno took home the grand prize on season four.


Collected from : http://abcnews.go.com
[Continue Reading]
Powered By Blogger · Designed By Seo Blogger Templates